⚠

NOTICE! This is a static HTML version of a legacy LOCI Software ticket.

LOCI projects are now located on GitHub. The Bio-Formats project can be found here.

Ticket #712 (closed defect: fixed)

Opened 2012-06-11T16:00:14-05:00

Last modified 2012-06-15T18:44:29-05:00

Tri-exponential fit results don't agree with TRI2

Reported by: aivar Owned by: aivar
Priority: major Milestone: slimplugin1.1
Component: slim-plugin Severity: serious
Keywords: Cc:
Blocked By: Blocking: #674

Description (last modified by aivar)

Using same RLD+LMA fit as #697, (146, 230) of 100611-YG-256.sdt, Gaussian noise:

Single exponential results agree, but triple exponential differ:

TRI2: A1 73.24 T1 2.09 A2 3.87 T2 1.77 A3 2.82 T3 0.00E+0 X2 0.852904

SLIM Plugin: A1 87.63362 T1 1.911811 A2 30.0 T2 0.25 A3 30.0 T3 0.1 Z 1.1207124 X2 0.8863228

Interesting that SP A2/T2 and A3/T3 results are so bad. They look like initial estimates that did not change.

Change History

comment:1 Changed 2012-06-11T16:01:08-05:00 by aivar

  • Status changed from new to assigned
  • Description modified

comment:2 Changed 2012-06-15T18:44:29-05:00 by aivar

  • Status changed from assigned to closed
  • Resolution set to fixed

Results agree now.