Ticket #713 (closed defect: fixed)
Opened 2012-06-11T17:01:00-05:00
Last modified 2012-09-13T17:43:55-05:00
Stretched exponential fit results don't agree with TRI2
Reported by: | aivar | Owned by: | aivar |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: |
|
Component: | slim-plugin | Severity: | serious |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Blocked By: | Blocking: |
Description
Using same RLD+LMA fit as #697, (146, 230) of 100611-YG-256.sdt, Gaussian noise:
Single exponential results agree, but stretched exponential differ:
TRI2: A 93.23 T 1.78 H 1.15 Z 0.77 X2 0.858475
SLIM Plugin: A 87.63362 T 1.911811 H 100.0 Z 1.1207124 X2 22.582573
Change History
comment:2 Changed 2012-06-12T11:53:03-05:00 by aivar
comment:3 Changed 2012-08-01T15:13:20-05:00 by aivar
- Blocking 674 removed
Removed blocking #674 so I could close that ticket. This is a very specific instance of TRI2/SLIM Plugin disagreement unlike the others.
I will address this bug when I work on SLIM Curve; I'm planning to add a Gamma function there.
comment:4 Changed 2012-08-07T10:03:40-05:00 by aivar
- Milestone changed from slimplugin1.1 to slimplugin1.2
comment:5 Changed 2012-09-13T16:27:19-05:00 by aivar
- Milestone changed from slimplugin1.2 to slimplugin1.1A
comment:6 Changed 2012-09-13T17:38:29-05:00 by aivar
- Status changed from assigned to closed
- Resolution set to fixed
Now that I have GCI_gamma this is easy to fix.
comment:7 Changed 2012-09-13T17:43:55-05:00 by aivar
Verified that for 100611-YG-256.sdt, pixel (144, 230), cursors 1.3184/1.8066/11.2305, stretched exponential, maximum likelihood, RLD+LMA I get:
TRI2 Z 1.225 A 58.804 tau 1.495E+0 h 1.415
SP Z 1.225 A 58.804 tau 1.495 h 1.415