Ticket #713 (closed defect: fixed)
Opened 20120611T17:01:0005:00
Last modified 20120913T17:43:5505:00
Stretched exponential fit results don't agree with TRI2
Reported by:  aivar  Owned by:  aivar 

Priority:  major  Milestone: 

Component:  slimplugin  Severity:  serious 
Keywords:  Cc:  
Blocked By:  Blocking: 
Description
Using same RLD+LMA fit as #697, (146, 230) of 100611YG256.sdt, Gaussian noise:
Single exponential results agree, but stretched exponential differ:
TRI2: A 93.23 T 1.78 H 1.15 Z 0.77 X2 0.858475
SLIM Plugin: A 87.63362 T 1.911811 H 100.0 Z 1.1207124 X2 22.582573
Change History
comment:2 Changed 20120612T11:53:0305:00 by aivar
comment:3 Changed 20120801T15:13:2005:00 by aivar
 Blocking 674 removed
Removed blocking #674 so I could close that ticket. This is a very specific instance of TRI2/SLIM Plugin disagreement unlike the others.
I will address this bug when I work on SLIM Curve; I'm planning to add a Gamma function there.
comment:4 Changed 20120807T10:03:4005:00 by aivar
 Milestone changed from slimplugin1.1 to slimplugin1.2
comment:5 Changed 20120913T16:27:1905:00 by aivar
 Milestone changed from slimplugin1.2 to slimplugin1.1A
comment:6 Changed 20120913T17:38:2905:00 by aivar
 Status changed from assigned to closed
 Resolution set to fixed
Now that I have GCI_gamma this is easy to fix.
comment:7 Changed 20120913T17:43:5505:00 by aivar
Verified that for 100611YG256.sdt, pixel (144, 230), cursors 1.3184/1.8066/11.2305, stretched exponential, maximum likelihood, RLD+LMA I get:
TRI2 Z 1.225 A 58.804 tau 1.495E+0 h 1.415
SP Z 1.225 A 58.804 tau 1.495 h 1.415