⚠	NOTICE! This is a static HTML version of a legacy LOCI Software ticket. LOCI projects are now located on GitHub. The Bio-Formats project can be found here.

Ticket #787 (closed defect: fixed)

Opened 2013-01-18T15:45:44-06:00

Last modified 2013-12-06T14:57:00-06:00

Compare SLIM Plugin and SPC Image results

Reported by:	aivar	Owned by:	aivar
Priority:	major	Milestone:	~~slimplugin1.2~~
Component:	slim-plugin	Severity:	major
Keywords:		Cc:
Blocked By:	#799	Blocking:

Description

Compare fitted results for the same source image, with settings as close as possible.

Change History

comment:1 Changed 2013-02-14T16:17:48-06:00 by aivar

Blocked By 799 added

comment:2 Changed 2013-03-07T18:32:03-06:00 by aivar

SLIM Plugin currently has no 'estimate Z from pre-fit' option as in TRI2. SPC Image estimates the same Z (offset) for single, double, and triple exponential.

For single and double exponential fits SPC Image does a great job of estimating fitted parameters. The default setting for subsequent iterative fitting is only 5 iterations. In SLIM Plugin and TRI2 the double exponential fit estimate is based on a formula using the single exponential fit estimate parameters.

comment:3 Changed 2013-12-06T14:57:00-06:00 by aivar

Status changed from new to closed
Resolution set to fixed

Moved to github: https://github.com/uw-loci/slim-plugin/issues/13